The world is being quietly rearranged by people who write very long documents.


The title they went with The Macroeconomic Effects of Bank Regulation: New Evidence from a High-Frequency Approach Noisy translates that to

Making banks safer means fewer jobs, new research finds


New research quantifies the trade-off between making banks safer and keeping people employed. It turns out that stricter bank rules reduce financial risk but also increase unemployment.
For years, central banks have debated how much financial stability costs the broader economy. This paper puts a number on it. It turns out that a small reduction in bank risk leads to a larger increase in unemployment, giving regulators a clearer picture of the real-world cost of making banks safer.
Watch for how central bank officials discuss the trade-off between financial stability and employment in future speeches, especially if they cite this kind of research.

If you insist
Read the original →