The world is being quietly rearranged by people who write very long documents.


The title they went with Occupational Safety and Health Standards; Interpretation of the General Duty Clause: Limitation for Inherently Risky Professional Activities Noisy translates that to

US labor regulators consider limiting safety rules for 'inherently risky' jobs


The US Labor Department is thinking about changing how it applies workplace safety rules to jobs that are already considered dangerous. This could mean that some employers would not have to follow the same strict safety requirements for certain professional activities.
For decades, US labor law has held employers responsible for providing a safe workplace, even for jobs with inherent risks. This proposed change could create a legal carve-out, shifting some of that responsibility away from employers. It could also set a precedent for how 'inherently risky' is defined across different professions.
Watch for the specific jobs or industries that lobby hardest for this change, and how the Labor Department defines 'inherently risky professional activities' in the final rule.

If you insist
Read the original →