The world is being quietly rearranged by people who write very long documents.


The title they went with Review of Replies to Replies Noisy translates that to

US freight regulators might allow more arguments in their cases


The Surface Transportation Board is considering changing a rule that bans replies to replies in legal filings. This could mean parties in freight disputes get more chances to argue their points in writing.
For years, the Board has limited how many rounds of arguments parties can submit. This kept cases moving faster, but it also meant some arguments might not get a full response. Allowing more replies could make the process fairer for some, but it could also slow down decisions and make cases more expensive.
Watch for the Board's final decision and whether it includes specific limits on the number or length of additional replies, or if it opens the door to unlimited back-and-forth.

If you insist
Read the original →